Palmer v. Brown

In this action to recover for architectural services, with a cross-complaint raising issues of fraud, negligence and illegality of contract, defendant appeals from an adverse judgment.

Plaintiffs, Dan Saxon Palmer and William Krisel, co-partners, brought this action to recover $2,190.01 as the balance claimed to be due for architectural services rendered to defendant. Count one of the complaint alleged, in part, the execution of a written contract whereby plaintiffs, as a co-partnership, agreed to render various architectural and professional services to defendant in connection with the design…