Legal Opinion
State v. Sonnie
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 1, 1975No. 5-209PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDahliNg, J.
This cause is before this court on the petition of the state of Ohio for permission to file a bill of exceptions. The attorney for the trial court has filed a memorandum in response which argues that the state’s petition ought to be denied.
We are of the opinion that the state’s petition must be denied. The Ohio Supreme Court in Euclid v. Heaton (1968), 15 Ohio St. 2d 65, in paragraph four of the syllabus, said:
“Sections 2945.67 to 2945.70, inclusive, Revised Code, are unconstitutional insofar as they permit the prosecutor in a criminal case to institute proceedings to review a judgment of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. SangesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- City of Euclid v. HeatonOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. HuntsmanOhio Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. EnglandOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. SpratzOhio Supreme Court · 1979