Legal Opinion

State v. Collins

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1970No. 69-680PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerbert, J.

The question before us is whether the state, in a criminal case, may prosecute an appeal from an order granting a defendant’s pre-trial motion to suppress evidence.

Section 3 of Article IV of the Ohio Constitution, pertaining to the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals, provides, in part:

“* * * Courts of Appeals shall have such jurisdiction as may be provided by law to review and affirm, modify, or reverse judgments or final orders of the courts of record *108inferior to the Court of Appeals within the district * *

This, and former analogous language, has been held to empower the General Assembly…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. DiBella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Commonwealth v. BosurgiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Cogen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Bell v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Polikoff v. AdamOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Amato v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API