State v. Spratz

I would affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the reason expressed in its journal entry and opinion that the state did not have a right to appeal from the lower court’s dismissal of the criminal charges based on the failure to comply with the speedy trial staute. See former R. C. 2945.68 and 2945.70; see, also, *66State v. Sonnie (1975), 46 Ohio App. 2d 164, tó the same effect, and cases therein cited.

I would also affirm for the following reasons. As the majority opinion states, the state and defendant agreed-in the trial court that more than 270 days had elapsed from, the date of…