Legal Opinion

In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 2011No. 2009-2298PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, C.J.

{¶ 1} Columbus Southern Power Company (“CSP”) appeals from the Public Utilities Commission’s denial of its request for authority to sell or transfer two generation facilities, as well as its decision to deny cost recovery associated with the facilities. The commission defends its decision on the merits, and it also asserts that we lack jurisdiction to consider this matter because CSP failed to preserve these issues for appellate review.

{¶ 2} We have jurisdiction in this matter; CSP timely applied for rehearing and thereby preserved its right to appeal. On the merits, however, CSP has not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Utility Service Partners, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Weiss v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Senior Citizens Coalition v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Application Seeking Approval of Ohio Power Company's Proposal to Enter Into an Affiliate Power Purchase Agreement for Inclusion in the Power Purchase Agreement RiderOhio Supreme Court · 2018
  2. In re Application of Ohio Edison Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  3. In re Application of Ohio Edison Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API