In re Application of Ohio Edison Co. (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, C.J.
{¶ 1} Appellants, Northeast Ohio Public Energy Council (“NOPEC”) and the Environmental Law and Policy Center (“ELPC”), appeal the decision of the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (“PUCO”) approving an electric-security plan proposed by intervening appellees, the FirstEnergy Companies (Ohio Edison Company, Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, and Toledo Edison Compa ny (collectively, “FirstEnergy”)). For the reasons explained below, we affirm the commission’s order.
Background
{¶ 2} An electric-distribution utility is required to provide a “standard service offer” to all consumers in its…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Constellation NewEnergy, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Monongahela Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Time Warner AxS v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- AK Steel Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.