Legal Opinion

Senior Citizens Coalition v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1988No. Nos. 88-612, 88-647, 88-648, 88-651, 88-657, 88-737 and 88-738PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

OCC’s prior appeals differ from the present cases because in the prior appeals OCC had filed notices of appeal to this court before' disposition of its own applications for rehearing before the commission. Here, appellants have filed notices of appeal with this court before final disposition of another’s application for rehearing. Nevertheless, for the reasons that follow, we grant the motions to dismiss.

Under the Ohio Constitution,2 our jurisdiction to hear appeals in public utilities cases is as prescribed by statute. The relevant statutes are R.C. 4903.10, 4903.11 and 4903.13.3

R.C. 4903.11…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Columbus & Cincinnati Highway, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Toledo Edison Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Discount Cellular, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Ohio Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. City of Cincinnati v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API