Schmoldt Importing Co. v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Vice Chief Justice.
The dispositive issue presented for our review is whether the plaintiff-consignee made a timely written complaint of damaged and delayed goods to the defendant-carrier in compliance with the notice requirements of Article 26 of the Warsaw Convention [Convention]. 1 We answer in the affirmative insofar as the consignee’s claim affects damaged goods and in the negative as to delayed goods.
THE ANATOMY OF LITIGATION
On September 6, 1982 Schmoldt Importing Company [Schmoldt], a Tulsa merchant, purchased 1,000 fur hats for retail sale during the 1982 Christmas season.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Flick v. CrouchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Thomas v. Keith Hensel Optical LabsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Retherford v. Halliburton Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Reams v. Tulsa Cable Television, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Womack v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hulsey v. Mid-America Preferred Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Hadnot v. ShawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Velasquez Ex Rel. Estate of Velasquez v. Aerovias Nacionales De Colombia, S.A.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1990
- Arkwright Mutual Insurance v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1990
- French Energy, Inc. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.