Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Keith Hensel Optical Labs

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 12, 1982No. 57438PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Justice:

The issue presented on certiorari is whether every injury that occurs on an employer-provided parking lot while a claimant is going to or coming from work does, as a matter of law, arise out of and in the course of employment. We answer in the negative.

Henry Thomas [Claimant] was employed as a lens grinder by Hensel Optical Labs [Employer]. On the morning of the accident the claimant’s supervisor informed the staff that the lab would close early that day due to inclement weather and advised the employees they should take only thirty minutes for lunch instead of the normal…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Radio Officers' Union of the Commercial Telegraphers Union v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Nevada Consolidated Copper Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Corn Products Refining Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Federal Trade Commission v. Pacific States Paper Trade Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. American Management Systems, Inc. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. Wetsel v. Independent School District I-1Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  4. Jackson v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  5. FARLEY v. CITY OF CLAREMORESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API