Jensky v. State Board of Equalization
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, P. J.
By stipulation of the parties to the above entitled actions, which were consolidated by order of the trial court, this appeal is submitted on the record in the Will case, it being agreed that the complaints are identical except as to the names of the parties and the locations of their businesses, and that the same judgment was rendered in both actions.. Plaintiffs’ amended complaints alleged that they were operating places of business in San Francisco, duly authorized to sell spirituous liquors under licenses issued by defendant Board of Equalization; that complaints for revocation of their…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Collier & Wallis, Ltd. v. AstorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Alexander v. State Personnel Bd. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1943
- People v. WeitzelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- California Employment Commission v. Butte County Rice Growers Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Stowe v. Fritzie Hotels, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Friedland v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Child v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Larwood Co. v. San Diego Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Rudolph v. FultonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.