Legal Opinion
Rudolph v. Fulton
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 25, 1960No. Civ. 18673PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBray, P. J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered after order sustaining demurrer without leave to amend. *
Questions Presented
1. Does a state court have jurisdiction (a) in view of the exclusive remedies provided by the Securities Exchange Act ; (b) because plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies ?
2. Was the trial judge prejudiced?
Pleadings
Defendants are the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., “The Principal Defendant,” and 13 officers and “Sub Committee Members” of the association. The complaint is for “Damages and Defamation.” Defendants demurred generally and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Berri v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Solomon v. SolomonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Child v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Twomey v. Mitchum, Jones & Templeton, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- O'Keefe v. Atascadero County Sanitation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Sousa v. Capital Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Lewis v. HankinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Rudolph v. National Ass'n of Securities Dealers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1961