Legal Opinion
State v. Maybee
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 12, 2010No. 06C12593; A139270PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.
In 1998, the State of Oregon, along with 46 other states, entered into the Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) with the leading tobacco product manufacturers in the United States. ORS 323.803(5). Pursuant to that agreement, the participating manufacturers were required, among other things, to pay substantial sums to the state annually. In return, the state released most “past, present, and * * * future claims against them[.]” Id. In order to neutralize the market advantage that nonparticipating manufacturers would have enjoyed by virtue of not having to make payments, the state, pursuant to the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Williams v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Mescalero Apache Tribe v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- CTS Corp. v. Dynamics Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Puyallup Tribe v. Department of Game of Wash.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People ex rel. Becerra v. Huber, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Sternberg v. Lechman-SuCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. BurkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- In Re HobartUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2011
- P. ex rel. Becerra v. HuberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.