Sanders v. Palmer
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the. United States for the Southern District of Mew York. At Law. Action by John E. Palmer against Charles W. Sanders and others for malicious prosecution. "Verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendants allege error.
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs in error were defendants in the court below in an action for malicious prosecution founded upon the arrest and trial of the plaintiff upon a charge of larceny. It appeared upon the trial that the plaintiff was arrested June 9, 3889, upon a warrant issued by a magistrate of Middlesex county, M. J., based upon a complaint made by the defendant Charles W. Sanders, which stated, in substance, that the plaintiff had feloniously stolen and taken away 120 red cedar posts, and 16 trunks of felled red cedar trees, the goods and chattels of Charles W. Sanders. On…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stewart v. SonnebornSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Besson v. . SouthardNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
- Foshay v. FergusonNew York Supreme Court · 1846
- Bulkeley v. . KeteltasNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
- Mitchell v. WallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Walczyk v. RioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- National Surety Co. v. PageCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
- Seaboard Oil Co. v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
- Henning v. MillerWyoming Supreme Court · 1932
- Staunton v. GoshornCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1899
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.