Legal Opinion

Seaboard Oil Co. v. Cunningham

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 22, 1931No. 5976PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Circuit Judge.

This is a suit to recover damages for malicious prosecution and false arrest. Demurrers to the complaint Were overruled, and issue was joined on a plea of not guilty. The ease was tried to a jury, and resulted in a verdict in favor of appellee for $5,318, on which judgment was entered. Error is assigned to the action of the court in overruling the demurrers.

Undoubtedly it is essential for the plaintiff, in an action for false arrest or malicious prosecution, to allege and prove both malice and want of probable cause, but malice may be inferred from want of probable…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Stewart v. SonnebornSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Webster v. UptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Brown v. SelfridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Stainer v. San Luis Valley Land & Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
  5. Sanders v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1893

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Sheetz, Inc. v. Bowles Rice McDavid Graff & Love, PLLCWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Kaufman v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. State v. SchererWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Good Holding Co. v. BoswellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
  5. Kozlowski v. FerraraDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API