Legal Opinion

Besson v. . Southard

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1851PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] To maintain this action it was incumbent on the plaintiff to prove that he had been sued by the defendant, as alleged, maliciously and without probable cause; for if there was probable cause for such suit, although it was maliciously commenced, the action could not be sustained. Want of probable cause and malice must concur. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Masten v. DeyoNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  2. Hall v. SuydamNew York Supreme Court · 1849

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Stewart v. SonnebornSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. People v. OdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Schultz v. . Greenwood CemeteryNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  4. People Ex Rel. Hirschberg v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  5. Hess v. Oregon Baking Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1897

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API