Legal Opinion

Henning v. Miller

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1932No. 1696PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tedball, District Judge.

This is an action for malicious prosecution. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant has brought proceedings in error. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the court below in the malicious prosecution case, whether speaking of the action for malicious prosecution or of the criminal action out of which the malicious prosecution arose.

The defendant during the time in question was the owner and proprietor of the Henning Hotel at Casper, and the plaintiff was employed by him as bookkeeper, having begun such employment in October, 1927, and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Crescent City Live Stock Co. v. Batchers' Union Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Director General of Railroads v. KastenbaumSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Franzen v. ShenkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Barron v. MasonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1858
  5. Munns v. De NemoursU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania · 1811

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Cates v. EddyWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Kimbley v. City of Green RiverWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Wilson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Keats v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Adam Gerics v. Alex TrevinoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API