Legal Opinion

National Surety Co. v. Page

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided April 22, 1932No. 3248PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*146PARKER, Circuit Judge.

Tins is an appeal in an action at law instituted to recover damages for malicious prosecution. The plaintiff in the court below was one R. Lee Page, former agent of the National Surety Company. The company was defendant. The declaration alleged that the company maliciously and without probable cause instituted a proceeding before the State Corporation Commission of Virginia to revoke the license of Page as an insurance agent authorized to do business in the state; that the proceeding had been dismissed; and that Page had been damaged in his business and reputation, and…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Stewart v. SonnebornSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Stacey v. EmerySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Crescent City Live Stock Co. v. Batchers' Union Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Wheeler v. NesbittSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
  5. Kellogg v. CochranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Rainier's Dairies v. Raritan Valley Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  2. Hardy v. VialCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Patricia A. Johnson v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  4. Melvin v. PenceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  5. Toft v. KetchumSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API