Legal Opinion
Zavisza v. Hastings
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 29, 1955PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The plaintiffs brought this action to recover damages from the defendant. The latter claimed a right of way over the land of the plaintiffs and, in his counterclaim, sought an injunction restraining them from preventing his use and enjoyment of this way. The plaintiffs have appealed from the judgment rendered for the defendant on the complaint and the counterclaim.
In their assignments of error, the plaintiffs claim that the trial court erred in refusing to find facts set forth in twenty paragraphs of the draft finding and in finding the facts stated in twenty-two paragraphs of the finding.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Horowitz v. F. E. Spencer Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
- Schroeder v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Maruca v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Blanchard v. MaxsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
- Aksomitas v. South End Realty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Kelly v. IvlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Wadsworth Realty Co. v. SundbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Robert S. Weiss & Co. v. MullinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Cheever v. GravesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
- Kelley v. TomasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.