Legal Opinion
Aksomitas v. South End Realty Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 14, 1949PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The principal issue presented upon this appeal is whether the court erred in denying the plaintiff injunctive relief against the defendant’s interference with her claimed right of way over its land through her rear gate to the public highway. The plaintiff has appealed from the court’s judgment for the defendant and has assigned error in its finding, conclusions and judgment.
We summarize the material undisputed facts. Since June 20, 1930, the plaintiff has been the owner of 15 Capitol Avenue in Hartford. The premises consist of a lot fronting 22 feet on the street and 101.85 feet deep, with a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Horowitz v. F. E. Spencer Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
- Hawley v. McCabeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Speight v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Lawton v. HerrickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- C. B. Alling Realty Co. v. OldermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Foot v. BaumanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
- Wadsworth Realty Co. v. SundbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Klein v. DeRosaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Kuras v. KopeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Putnam, Coffin & Burr, Inc. v. HalpernSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.