Legal Opinion
Spong v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided August 2, 1979No. Appeal, No. 769 C.D. 1978PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Crumlish, Jr.,
Did Beverly C. Spong voluntarily terminate her employment without cause of a necessitous and compelling nature so as to render her ineligible for benefits under Section 402(b)(1) of the Unemployment Compensation Law,1 43 P.S. §802(b) (1) ?
The Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (UCBR) answered in the affirmative. We agree.
*562Spong worked as a part-time secretary at Girio Agency for approximately six months when Girio advised her that he needed a full-time secretary with some bookkeeping experience. Four weeks later, a full-time secretary was hired who replaced…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tokar v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Veneski v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Unemployment Compensation Board of Review of the Commonwealth v. PingerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Knox v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Bradley Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hughes v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Matty v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Ormiston v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Zimmerman v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Zimmerman v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986