Veneski v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Mencer,
Tina Venesld (claimant) has appealed an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) denying her benefits. The Board adopted the referee’s determination that benefits to claimant should be discontinued because she refused to apply for suitable work.1 We affirm.
Claimant’s work history has particular significance in this case. Upon her graduation from high school and for a period of about two years thereafter, claimant worked as a secretary-receptionist for about $80 a week. Her duties included “some bookkeeping,” as did the duties of her next job, where…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kanouse v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hughes v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Eichman v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Hammerstone v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Liebrum v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Spong v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.