Legal Opinion · Dissent

Zimmerman v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 16, 1986No. Appeal, 842 C.D. 1985Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Judge Palladino:

I respectfully dissent.

The question of whether a retirement becomes an involuntary termination when a retiree, retiring with full pension benefits, attempts to rescind her retirement in order to remain eligible for Employer provided economic benefits has not previously been addressed by this Court. I strongly disagree with the majority’s suggested resolution of this question.

In the instant case, the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) affirmed the decision of a referee concluding that Eleanor Zimmerman (Claimant) voluntarily terminated her…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gladieux Food Services, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Barillaro v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Renne v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Adamski v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Tretter v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API