Legal Opinion

Motor Freight, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1929No. 21396PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C. J.

The issues involved in this error proceeding raise mixed questions of law and fact and require this court to judicially review the evidence to determine whether the findings of fact of the commission are reasonable and lawful, and also whether legal principles governing the same have been properly applied.

In the last analysis the question for determination is whether Motor Freight, Inc., so conducts its business as to constitute it a common carrier, and whether it is a motor transportation company, as defined by Section 614-84, General Code of Ohio. That section provides, in part, as follows:

“…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hissem v. GuranOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Breuer v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Craig v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Northern Ohio Traction & Light Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Public Util. Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Arizona Corp. Commission v. Continental Security GuardsArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State & Railroad & Warehouse Commission v. Rock Island Motor Transit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  4. New York Central Rd. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1930
  5. State and R. R. W. H. Comm. v. R.I. M. T. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API