Legal Opinion

Craig v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1926No. 19954PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C. J.

This is an error proceeding from the Public Utilities Commission seeking to reverse an order of the commission wherein one R. L. Craig, an operator of trucks for hire, was adjudged to have ceased to be a private contract carrier and to have become a common carrier.

The pertinent facts disclosed at the hearing before the Public Utilities Commission were that Craig had been in the business of hauling merchandise for hire in and about the city of Urbana since 1912; that he had secured a certificate from the Public Utilities Commission to operate as a common carrier in irregular service upon an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cushing v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Hissem v. GuranOhio Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Stoner v. UndersethMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  2. The Home Insurance Company v. Thomas H. Riddell, Jr., and Charles F. RiddellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  3. Breuer v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Motor Freight, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Motor Freight, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API