Legal Opinion
State and R. R. W. H. Comm. v. R.I. M. T. Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 27, 1940No. Nos. 32,739, 32,740, 32,741, 32,753, 32,790PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 295 N.W. 519. The question for decision is whether or not respondent is entitled to a "permit" as a contract carrier by motor transportation under L. 1933, c. 170. The statute has been amended in respects not here material. 3 Mason Minn. St. 1940 Supp. §§ 5015-20 to 5015-44. The railroad and warehouse commission denied the permit, and on appeal the district court reversed the commission.
Respondent is an Illinois corporation the stock of which is wholly owned by the trustees in bankruptcy of the Chicago, Rock Island Pacific Railway Company. The bankruptcy proceedings of the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- United States v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. Union Stock Yard & Transit Co. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Henderson v. HendersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Barrett v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- United States v. Brooklyn Eastern District TerminalSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Durfee v. Rod Baxter Imports, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Headley v. City of NorthfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- In Re Acquisition of Flying Cloud AirportSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- City of Minneapolis v. MINNEAPOLIS TRANSIT COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Rock Island Motor Transit Co. v. Murphy Motor Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.