Legal Opinion
Kane v. Locke
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 24, 1944No. 33,856PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Holt, Commissioner.
This is the second appeal by plaintiff to this court in her alleged cause of action against defendant. The first appeal is reported in Kane v. Locke, 216 Minn. 170, 12 N. W. (2d) 495. Therein, Mr. Justice Youngdahl gives a full account of the trial and the issues presented for review. Nothing need be added thereto. Plaintiff now appears by . a new attorney and asks for a new trial on the ground of error in the charge of Judge Rue and also on the ground that she has been deprived of her right of recovery in violation of U. S. Const. Amend. XIV, § 1.
No objection to Judge…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Christensen v. Hennepin Transportation Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Kane v. LockeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Kozisek v. BrighamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
3Cited by6 opinions
- Smith v. Otto Hendrickson Post 212, American LegionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Heise v. the JR Clark Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Mjos Ex Rel. Mjos v. Village of Howard LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Ellingboe v. GuerinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- David N. Volkmann Construction, Inc. v. IsaacsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.