Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Norell

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 21, 1937No. 31,286Published

1Per curiam

Verdict for plaintiff. Defendants moved in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial. Judgment ordered notwithstanding the verdict. On plaintiff’s appeal the judgment was reversed. Pearson v. Norell, 198 Minn. 303, 269 N. W. 643. Thereafter defendants presented the part of the alternative motion asking a new trial. It ivas denied. This appeal is from that order.

There is only one assignment of error. Its sufficiency is doubtful. But the argument in the brief clearly states the grounds for assailing the order. The motion for a new trial was based on the grounds (a)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pearson v. NorellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  2. Standard Lithographing Co. v. Twin City Motor Speedway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  3. Kozisek v. BrighamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API