Legal Opinion
Mahoney v. Kelley
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 13, 1923No. 23,545PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
Writ of certiorari to review the action of the district court of the Eighth district in establishing a judicial road in the counties of Scott and Le Sueur under and pursuant to section 41 of chapter 323, p. 436, of the Laws of 1921.
Eelators assert that the description of the road in the petition is defective. As described in the petition it begins at a designated quarter-section corner and runs thence due south on the section lines, which in this case happen also to be township lines, to a designated seotion corner. The objection seems to be that a line running due south from the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hunstiger v. KilianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Brazil v. County of SibleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. Village of HartlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- State ex rel. Hunt v. City of MontevideoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Fohl v. Common Council of Village of Sleepy Eye LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re Alteration of Highway in Counties of Fillmore & HoustonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- In re KlossnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- In Re Establishment of Judicial RoadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- In Re Establishment of Judicial Highway Between Sibley & Renville CountiesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- In re Establishment of Judicial RoadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928