Legal Opinion
In re Alteration of Highway in Counties of Fillmore & Houston
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 29, 1924No. 23,801PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Certiorari on the relation of the county of Houston to review the order of the district court of Fillmore county directing the opening of a highway in,the counties of Fillmore and Houston.
The highway was the subject of the controversy in In re Counties of Fillmore and Houston, 154 Minn. 246, 191 N. W. 598, .where we held that the burden of laying out and constructing a highway established under Laws 1921, p. 436, c. 323, § 41, rested upon the counties, and not the towns .through which the highway passed. Upon the going down of the mandate, the court entered an order directing that each of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State ex rel. Bass v. MacdonaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
- Alexander v. McInnisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Mahoney v. KelleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- In re KlossnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Forster v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Vacation of Part of Town of HibbingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- In re HullSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- In Re Establishment of Judicial RoadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Hauschild v. Counties of Lyon and LincolnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- In re Establishment of Judicial RoadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928