Legal Opinion
In re Klossner
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 12, 1923No. 23,464PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Certiorari to review the order of the district court in establishing a judicial highway in the counties of Blue Earth and Brown pursuant to Laws 1921, p. 436, c. 323, § 41.
The necessity or propriety of establishing a judicial highway is a legislative question. The most recent case involving the ques*441tion is In re Judicial Road, 156 Minn. 327, 194 N. W. 775, where the controlling principle is announced and the cases are collated. With the limited scope oí permissible judicial review there is nothing justifying a disturbance of the result reached by the trial court.
The court ordered that each…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mahoney v. KelleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- In re Proceedings for Alteration of a Public RoadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
3Cited by4 opinions
- County of Blue Earth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- In re Alteration of Highway in Counties of Fillmore & HoustonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- In Re Establishment of Judicial RoadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- In re Establishment of Judicial RoadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928