Coombs v. Hibberd.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
*453By the Court,
Niles, J.:
The defendant having recovered judgment in the Court below, the plaintiff moved for a new trial, and the motion was denied on the 13th of July, 1870.
On the 21st of July the plaintiff gave notice of a motion to “ vacate the order denying a new trial, and to grant an order allowing the motion for a new trial to be reheard.”
The application was to be made “ upon the pleadings, statement on motion for new trial, stipulation of facts, the findings of the Court, and judgment roll.”
This motion was heard on the twenty-third of July following, and taken under advisement by the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Morris v. De CelisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
3Cited by41 opinions
- Stevens v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Drinkhouse v. Van NessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Lake v. BenderNevada Supreme Court · 1884
- Carpenter v. Superior Court of San Joaquin Cty.California Supreme Court · 1888
- United Railroads v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.