Legal Opinion

Forest v. Parmalee

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1978No. Docket Nos. 56973, 56974, 56794, 58647. (Calendar Nos. 7-9)PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*353Blair Moody, Jr., J.

I. The Question

The single question engendered by these consolidated cases is whether the two-year statute of limitations provided for in 1964 PA 170 violates equal protection mandates and is therefore unconstitutional. See MCLA 691.1411; MSA 3.996(111).

II. Facts

1. Forest and Mills

Plaintiffs Forest and Mills were injured when Forest drove his car into an excavation for a drainage construction project on August 10, 1970. The plaintiffs filed separate complaints against defendants Parmalee and Davis, private excavators and contractors, who were performing the drainage…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Manistee Bank & Trust Co. v. McGowanMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Reich v. State Highway DepartmentMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Buscaino v. RhodesMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Fox v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Grubaugh v. City of St. JohnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Lothian v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. People v. RussoMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Gleason v. Department of TransportationMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Herman v. MagnusonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Taxpayers Allied for Constitutional Taxation v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1995

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API