Forest v. Parmalee
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*353Blair Moody, Jr., J.
I. The Question
The single question engendered by these consolidated cases is whether the two-year statute of limitations provided for in 1964 PA 170 violates equal protection mandates and is therefore unconstitutional. See MCLA 691.1411; MSA 3.996(111).
II. Facts
1. Forest and Mills
Plaintiffs Forest and Mills were injured when Forest drove his car into an excavation for a drainage construction project on August 10, 1970. The plaintiffs filed separate complaints against defendants Parmalee and Davis, private excavators and contractors, who were performing the drainage…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Manistee Bank & Trust Co. v. McGowanMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Reich v. State Highway DepartmentMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- Buscaino v. RhodesMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
- Fox v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
- Grubaugh v. City of St. JohnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Lothian v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. RussoMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
- Gleason v. Department of TransportationMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Herman v. MagnusonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Taxpayers Allied for Constitutional Taxation v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.