Legal Opinion

People v. Russo

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1992No. 90088, (Calendar No. 6)PublishedCited by 137 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyle, J.

We granted leave in this case to determine whether the amended statute of limitations set forth in MCL 767.24(2); MSA 28.964(2) applies to the prosecution of a charge of criminal sexual assault involving a minor where the alleged acts were committed prior to, yet were not time-barred on, the effective date of the amendment. The prosecution’s cross appeal was granted to answer the question whether the warrant authorizing the search of the defendant’s home was supported by an affidavit establishing probable cause if the amended statute governs prosecution.

We find that the extended limitation…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by137 opinions

  1. People v. KellyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. People v. BrownMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  4. People v. KazmierczakMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  5. People v. MartinMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006

132 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API