Legal Opinion
Roth v. Hartl
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 26, 1950No. Appeal, No. 157PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Bell,
Plaintiffs brought a bill in equity for specific performance of a written contract of sale of real estate in Bucks County. Plaintiffs also sought an account for rents received by the seller after the date of settlement, as well as for damages for losses sustained by defendants’ unlawful refusal to convey said property. Included in said agreement of sale were the following provisions:
“1. The Buyer agrees to pay for the said property the sum of Sixty-Five Hundred Dollars . . ., as follows: Six Hundred Dollars ... on the signing of this Agreement, the receipt whereof…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Sidle v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Asia Investment Co. v. LevinWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- DeBlois v. Boylston & Tremont Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Christy v. ChristySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Merritz v. CircelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Tobye R. Markowitz, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Northeast Land Company. Appeal of Tobye R. MarkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Allegheny Energy, Inc. v. Dqe, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Payne v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Portnoy v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Bettinger v. Carl Berke Assoc., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.