Legal Opinion

State v. Puga

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 1987No. 16883PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Angel Puga was convicted of vehicular manslaughter. On direct appeal, we affirmed the judgment of conviction and the fixed seven-year sentence. State v. Puga, 111 Idaho 874, 728 P.2d 398 (Ct.App.1986). Puga now appeals the denial of a motion to reduce his sentence under I.C.R. 35. The only issue before us is whether the district judge abused his discretion by denying Puga an evidentiary hearing before ruling on the motion. We affirm.

A Rule 35 motion essentially is a plea for leniency which may be granted if the sentence imposed was, for any reason, unduly severe. State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. LopezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. State v. ArambulaIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. TorresIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. State v. HoffmanIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. State v. PugaIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. IzaguirreIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. State v. BaylesIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. State v. FindeisenIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. State v. Keith Allan BrownIdaho Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. State v. ElliottIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API