Legal Opinion

State v. Puga

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided October 30, 1986No. 16143PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Chief Judge.

Angel Puga was convicted of vehicular manslaughter. He received a seven-year fixed sentence. On appeal, Puga argues that a fixed period of confinement without treatment for his chronic alcoholism violates his statutory and constitutional rights. He contends that probation with treatment should have been ordered; or that an indeterminate period of confinement with provision for treatment and rehabilitation was appropriate. We hold that Puga’s rights were not violated and that the trial judge did not abuse his sentencing discretion. We affirm the judgment and sentence.

Puga…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Hoptowit v. RayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. Holmes v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. State v. MillerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. State v. PettitIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. McFarlandIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. State v. PedersonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. State v. HadleyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. State v. PugaIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. State v. GarzaIdaho Court of Appeals · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API