Legal Opinion
Rojas v. Scottsdale Insurance
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided April 29, 2004No. S-03-557PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMiller-Lerman, J.
NATURE OF CASE
Ruben Rojas and Fabiola Rojas filed a petition in the district court for Douglas County against Scottsdale Insurance Company (Scottsdale) seeking a judgment in the amount of their dwelling insurance policy limits. The insured real property had been damaged by fire, but Scottsdale refused payment on the basis of a policy endorsement which provided that Scottsdale would not be liable for loss occurring while the insured property was vacant or unoccupied. In its answer, Scottsdale alleged that coverage was denied because the property had been unoccupied for more than 60 days prior…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Guerrier v. Mid-Century InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Unisys Corp. v. Nebraska Life & Health Insurance Guaranty Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- Walter Myers v. Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance Company, an Insurance Company Doing Business in IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Misle v. HJA, INC.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- Lundquist v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kut Suen Lui v. Essex Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2016
- Kut Suen Lui And May Far Lui v. Essex Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Lui v. Essex Insur. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2016