Legal Opinion

Kut Suen Lui And May Far Lui v. Essex Insurance Company

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 6, 2015No. 72835-1Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON C, r~~3 KUT SUEN LUI and MAY FAR LUI, ) NO. 72835-1-I ~ / I Respondents, ) ) DIVISION ONE ‘~ / %~D ~:;->U~ “ -~, c~ c~-~ ESSEX INSURANCE COMPANY, ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION Appellant. ) FILED: April 6, 2015 __________________________________________________________________________________) LAu, J. —After a vacant building owned by Kut Suen and May Far Lui was damaged by a frozen water pipe, Essex Insurance Co. denied coverage for the property loss because the Luis’ insurance policy excluded losses due to water damage when the building is vacant.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Queen City Farms, Inc. v. Central Nat'l Ins. Co. of OmahaWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. McDonald v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Hearst Communications v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Hearst Communications, Inc. v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API