Walter Myers v. Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance Company, an Insurance Company Doing Business in Illinois
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CUMMINGS, Chief Judge.
This appeal comes to us from the district court’s grant of summary judgment, 601 F.Supp. 620, in favor of the defendant Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance Company. This diversity case raises the issue of the proper construction of certain terms in an insurance contract. For the reasons set out below, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
I
In 1977, plaintiff Walter Myers purchased a fully occupied ten-unit apartment building in Lacón, Illinois. Subsequently he began to convert the units from oil to electric heat and charge the tenants for the fuel. As a result, the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States Fire Insurance v. SchnackenbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. v. Connecticut General Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Bennett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
- Commonwealth v. McHughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Kirk v. Financial Security Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- TRB Investments, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Catalina Enterprises, Incorporated Pension Trust v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company, and Jennings Insurance Associates, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Liqui-Box Corp. v. Estate of ElkmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- Warren Davis Properties V, L.L.C v. United Fire & Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- American Family Mutual Insurance v. PageAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.