Carmichael v. Scheidt
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeNNy, J.
The question presented on this appeal is whether or not the court below committed error in sustaining the respondent’s demurrer ore tenus.
This Court held in In re Wright, 228 N.C. 301, 45 S.E. 2d 370 and in s.e. on rehearing, 228 N.C. 584, 46 S.E. 2d 696, that a petitioner is entitled to a review whenever the suspension, cancelation, or revocation is made in the discretion of the Department, whether under G.S. 20-16, G.S. 20-23, or any other provision of the statute.
It is mandatory under the provisions of G.S. 20-17 (2) for the Department to revoke the license of any operator or chauffeur…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fox v. ScheidtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- In Re Revocation of License to Operate a Motor Vehicle of WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- In Re Revocation of License to Operate a Motor Vehicle of WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- State v. . McDanielsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. TeasleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Beaver v. ScheidtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- In Re AustinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- Gibson v. ScheidtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- In re the Cancellation or Suspension of the Operator's License of AustinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969