Legal Opinion

In Re Revocation of License to Operate a Motor Vehicle of Wright

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 10, 1947PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaknhiill, J.

Tbe statute, G. S. 20-16, vests tbe Department of Motor Yebicles with- discretionary authority “to suspend tbe license of any operator without preliminary bearing upon a showing by its records or other satisfactory evidence tbat tbe licensee: (7) Has committed an offense in another state, which if committed in this state would be grounds for suspension or revocation”; and in this State tbe revocation of a driver’s license is mandatory whenever it is made to appear tbat tbe licensee has been found guilty of “Driving a motor vehicle while under tbe influence of intoxicating liquor or a narcotic…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pue v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Pue v. HoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Joyner v. GarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Fox v. ScheidtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. In Re Revocation of License to Operate a Motor Vehicle of WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. Winesett v. ScheidtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Lamb v. ButlerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API