Legal Opinion

In Re Revocation of License to Operate a Motor Vehicle of Wright

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 17, 1948PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBabnhill, J.

Tbis cause was here at the Fall Term, 1947, and is reported ante at page 301, 45 S. E. (2d), 370. The Department of Motor Yehicles petitions for a rehearing for that (1) the former opinion is erroneous in that it interprets and applies G. S. 20-16, whereas the license of Wright was revoked under the terms of G. S. 20-23; and (2) the interpretation placed on G. S. 20-25, as applied to a revocation of license under G. S. 20-16 and G. S. 20-23, is tantamount to a declaration that the statutory provisions relating to the revocation of drivers’ licenses are unconstitutional.

In its brief it…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pue v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Pue v. HoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. In Re Revocation of License to Operate a Motor Vehicle of WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  4. State v. . BradsherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Wall v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Underwood v. HowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Joyner v. GarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Fox v. ScheidtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Thompson v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Harrell v. ScheidtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API