Legal Opinion

State v. . McDaniels

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 31, 1941PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBabNbxll, J.

The defendant challenges the sufficiency of the testimony for that there is no evidence that his driver’s license was revoked. He bases this argument upon the contention that the municipal court of Winston-Salem was without power to revoke the defendant’s license.

The exact nature of the judgment in the original cause does not appear. The only reference thereto is a stipulation of record as follows:

“It is stipulated by the defendant that he was indicted in the Municipal Court of the City of Winston-Salem on January 3, 1940, for reckless driving and that the judgment provided, among other…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fox v. ScheidtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. ColeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Harrell v. ScheidtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. State v. CarlisleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API