State v. McRae
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Curiam.
The defendant’s assignments of error are to the admission of evidence and to the judgment. His second assignment of error, based upon his exception 23, arose as follows. The defendant testified in his own behalf. The State in rebuttal called as a witness Paul McQueen, a deputy sheriff, who testified that he knew the general reputation of the defendant, and that the defendant had had the reputation for five or six years of making and selling whiskey. After the direct and cross-examination of this witness the presiding judge asked the witness, the following questions: “Q. Have you…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. CanipeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. CantrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- State v. . WoolardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. ColsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. FrazierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. CurrieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. PetersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.