State v. Currie
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUSKINS, Justice.
Mrs. Alexander heard defendant’s voice for the first time during the assault upon her. On direct examination she stated that the voice of her assailant “was not the voice of an average colored man.” When defendant testified during the trial she immediately recognized his voice as that of her assailant. Then, when the defense rested, the trial judge permitted the State to reopen its case and permitted Mrs. Alexander to testify, over objection, that she recognized defendant’s voice as the voice of the man who raped and robbed her. Defense counsel then undertook to cross-examine…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. ColsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. GrundlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- State v. RiddickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. PinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. HartmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
- State v. OxendineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. BrinkleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
- Ross v. StahlDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.