Legal Opinion
Quast v. Ruggles
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 5, 1913No. 10801PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Lincoln county, Baske, J., entered March 81, 1918, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, after a trial on the merits before the court, in an action for cancellation.
1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.
The question presented by this appeal is the negotiability of the following note:
“On the first of November, 1920, for value received, we promise to pay to M. L. Bevis the principal sum of $1,200 (Twelve Hundred Dollars), with interest thereon at the rate of seven per cent per year, from the date hereof until maturity, payable annually according to the tenor of nine interest notes, each for $84 and one (1) for $80.97, bearing even date herewith; both principal and interest notes payable at the office of Bevis Bros., Spokane, Wash, (with exchange on New York). And if default be made in payment…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Watson v. Ky. & Ind. Bridge & Ry Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Wettlaufer v. BaxterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Gilley v. HarrellTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
- Fulton v. VarneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Westberg v. Chicago Lumber & Coal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Blackwell v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Grosfield v. First National BankMontana Supreme Court · 1925
- Foley v. HardySupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
- Bleitz v. Bryant Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
- North American Bond & Mortgage Co. v. TwohyWashington Supreme Court · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.