Legal Opinion

Grosfield v. First National Bank

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1925No. 5,618PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stark

This action was originally commenced against the defendant First National Bank of Miles City, the First National Bank of Ingomar, and E. E. Fleming, as receiver of the First National Bank of Ingomar, but during the course of the trial was dismissed as to the last two named parties, leaving the First National Bank of Miles City alone as the defendant.

In his complaint, the defendant alleges that he was at all the times mentioned the owner of, and entitled to the immediate possession of, the following described Liberty bonds, to-wit: One Liberty bond, Fourth issue, No. 150034, of the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Caha v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Wettlaufer v. BaxterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  3. Barstow v. Savage Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Scollans v. E. H. Rollins & SonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  5. McCarty v. KepretaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Wilson's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Greenstreet v. GreenstreetIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Pacific Nat. Agr. Credit Corporation v. HagermanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Atchison v. WeakleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  5. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. City of TauntonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API