Bleitz v. Bryant Lumber Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Frater, J., entered June 30, 1919, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract, after a trial on the merits.
1Opinion of the Court
On Rehearing.
2Per curiam
During the trial of this case, the respondent offered in evidence a letter from the Metropolitan Bank of Seattle to the appellant, enclosing a writing given by the respondent to the bank and addressed to the appellant, reading as follows:
“Please remit to the Metropolitan Bank proceeds of next boom of logs from me.”
The Department opinion (110 Wash. 437, 188 Pac. 509), decided that, if the instrument was on its face sufficient to amount to an assignment of the account to the bank, it was controlled by the negotiable *456instruments act, which declares that an assignment of an account…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Attorney-General v. Continental Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Tallman v. . HoeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Quast v. RugglesWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Shaw v. TonnsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Bleitz v. Bryant Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- Sundstrom v. SundstromWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Shockley v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928