Legal Opinion

State v. Mayer

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 18, 2004No. 21236-0-IIIPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C.J.

— John C. Mayer pleaded guilty to manufacturing methamphetamine. The trial court declined to impose a mandatory $2,000 drug fine because it reasoned Mr. Mayer’s incarceration would render him indigent. The State appeals. We hold the $2,000 drug fine is mandatory, unless suspended or deferred upon a finding the defendant is indigent. Because the trial court believed it had discretion to disregard the drug fine as being included in the mandatory drug clean-up fee also ordered, and because it did not make a proper record showing Mr. Mayer was indigent, we reverse.

FACTS

Mr. Mayer pleaded guilty to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Washington Public Ports Ass'n v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. C.J.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Jannot v. JannotWashington Supreme Court · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. O'NEALCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  2. State of Washington v. Ronald Aaron MaloneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  3. State Of Washington, V Johnny Ray CyrCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  4. State v. O'NealCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  5. State Of Washington v. Michael S. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API