Legal Opinion

State of Washington v. Ronald Aaron Malone

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 5, 2016No. 32781-7-IIIPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Price, J.*

¶1 Ronald Malone pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance—methamphetamine. At sentencing the judge imposed both mandatory and discretionary legal financial obligations (LFOs) on Malone. On appeal, Malone presents four arguments: (1) the trial court erred when it imposed discretionary LFOs without an on-the-record inquiry into Malone’s ability to pay, (2) the mandatory DNA1 collection fee violates substantive due process, (3) the mandatory DNA collection fee violates equal protec*764tion, and (4) the trial court abused its discretion by ordering Malone to submit a DNA sample.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BlazinaWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State of Washington v. Gary Lyle StoddardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  4. State v. KossWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. MayerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. GloverCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  2. State v. SchwartzWashington Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State Of Washington v. Jesse JohnsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  4. State Of Washington v. David Darrell SykesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  5. State Of Washington v. Kaela M. GloverCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API