State of Washington v. Ronald Aaron Malone
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Price, J.*
¶1 Ronald Malone pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance—methamphetamine. At sentencing the judge imposed both mandatory and discretionary legal financial obligations (LFOs) on Malone. On appeal, Malone presents four arguments: (1) the trial court erred when it imposed discretionary LFOs without an on-the-record inquiry into Malone’s ability to pay, (2) the mandatory DNA1 collection fee violates substantive due process, (3) the mandatory DNA collection fee violates equal protec*764tion, and (4) the trial court abused its discretion by ordering Malone to submit a DNA sample.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. BlazinaWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- State of Washington v. Gary Lyle StoddardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- State v. KossWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. MayerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. GloverCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- State v. SchwartzWashington Supreme Court · 2019
- State Of Washington v. Jesse JohnsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- State Of Washington v. David Darrell SykesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- State Of Washington v. Kaela M. GloverCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.